Rahppoye, Hekmat-e Honar

Rahppoye, Hekmat-e Honar

Form and meaning in artistic beauty, from the perspective of Thomas Aquinas and Eric Newton

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Lecturer, Department of Art Research, Faculty of Art, Islamic Azad University, Qaemshahr, Iran.
2 MSc Art Research Department, School of Theoretical Sciences, Iran University of Art, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
This study investigates the interplay between form and meaning in artistic beauty, focusing on the perspectives of Thomas Aquinas and Eric Newton. The relationship between form and meaning is a fundamental concern in aesthetics, as it distinguishes the beauty of art from the natural world. While numerous scholars have examined the aesthetic dimensions of artworks, this research specifically delves into the interconnectedness of form and meaning through a comparative analysis of Aquinas' and Newton's theories.
By employing a qualitative research method involving document analysis and a comparative approach, this study reveals that both thinkers, despite their distinct philosophical frameworks, concur that form and meaning are inextricably linked in artistic creation. Aquinas posits that form serves as the foundational element of an artwork, shaping all other components, while meaning is inherently tied to this form. Newton, on the other hand, emphasizes the intentional structuring of form to convey specific meanings.
Artistic beauty, a fundamental concept in philosophy and aesthetics, has been a subject of enduring interest among thinkers. Two essential elements of an artwork, form and meaning, are inextricably linked in the aesthetic experience. Thomas Aquinas, a Christian philosopher and theologian, was one of the first to systematically explore the concept of beauty, drawing on the works of Albertus Magnus and Dionysius. Within the framework of Christian theology, Aquinas revived traditional medieval aesthetic concepts and argued that artistic beauty is intrinsically connected to both the form or appearance of the artwork (which aligns with its inner nature or meaning) and its semantic content (which is manifested in the artwork's appearance). In contrast, Eric Newton, a contemporary philosopher, contends that artistic beauty arises from the coherent and structured relationship between form and meaning. He posits that the meaning embedded within an artwork can be intuitively grasped, and that artists construct this structure through the elements they choose to incorporate into their work.
While artistic beauty has been extensively examined by numerous scholars, this study delves into a specific aspect that has been relatively unexplored: the interconnected roles of form and meaning in shaping our aesthetic experiences. By focusing on the perspectives of Thomas Aquinas and Eric Newton, this research aims to fill a gap in the existing literature.

Research Question
The central question guiding this research is: How do Thomas Aquinas and Eric Newton conceptualize the relationship between form and meaning in artistic beauty?
This research delves into the interconnected roles of form and meaning in shaping our aesthetic experiences, as conceptualized by Thomas Aquinas and Eric Newton. By focusing on these two philosophers’ perspectives on the artwork and its context, we aim to provide a more comprehensive and structured understanding of the relationship between form and meaning in artistic beauty
Keywords

Subjects


Aertsen, J. (1991). Beauty in the Middle Ages: A Forgotten Transcendental. Medieval Philosophy and Theology, 1, 68–97.
Beshmar, M. (1398). Beauty and its relation to good in the philosophical system of Thomas Aquinas [Zibaei va Nesbat an ba Kheir dar Nezam Falsafi Thomas Aquinas]. Pajoohesh-haye Falsafi (Nashriyeh Daneshkadeh Adabiyat va Oloum Ensani Daneshgah Tabriz), (27), 136-117. (In Persian).
Eco, U. (1988). The Aesthetics of Thomas Aquinas (H. Bredin, Trans.). Harvard University Press.
Gilson, E. (1375). The foundations of Christian philosophy [Mabani Falsafeh Masihi] (M. Mohammad Rezaei & M. Mousavi, Trans., 1st ed.). Qom: Daftar Tablighat Eslami Howzeh Elmiye Qom. (In Persian).
Maurer, A. A. (1392). About beauty: A Thomistic interpretation [Falsafeh Zibaei Tafsiri Tomaei] (H. Rabiei, Trans., 1st ed.). Tehran: Hekmat. (In Persian).
Newton, E. (1397). The meaning of beauty [Ma'ni Zibaei] (P. Marzban, Trans., 9th ed.). Tehran: Entesharat Elmi va Farhangi. (In Persian).
Rabiei, H., & Pazouki, S. (1390). The concept of beauty in Thomas Aquinas [Mafhoum Zibaei Nazd-e Thomas Aquinas]. Andisheh Dini Daneshgah Shiraz, (40), 92-69. (In Persian).
Ritter, J., et al. (1389). Historical dictionary of philosophical concepts [Farhangnameh Tarikhi Mafahim Falsafi] (M. H. Hosseini Beheshti et al., Trans., Vol. 1: Falsafeh Honar, 1st ed.). Tehran: Moasseseh Pajooheshi Hekmat va Falsafeh & Now Arghanun. (In Persian).
Sanei, F., & Shaghool, Y. (1393). Thomas Aquinas's explanation of the relationship between beauty, good, and truth within the framework of the discussion of the transcendental attributes of being [Tabyin Thomas Aquini az Nesbat Miyan Zibaei ba Kheir va Haqiqat]. Pajoohesh-haye Hastishenakhti, (5), 105-85. (In Persian).
Shakibadel, M. (1395). Artistic beauty and the representation of nature (in the aesthetic theory of Thomas Aquinas) [Zibaei Honari va Baznamaee Tabiat]. Hasti va Shenakht, (1), 96-79. (In Persian).
Tatarkiewicz, W. (1387). History of aesthetics, The aesthetics of Thomas Aquinas [Tarikh Zibashinasi, Zibashinasi-ye Thomas Aquinas] (M. Nabaei, Trans.). Zibashenakht, (19), 52-50. (In Persian).
Tatarkiewicz, W. (1980). A history of six ideas: An essay in aesthetics. Polish Scientific Publishers.
Tatarkiewicz, W. (2005). History of aesthetics, Volume 2: Medieval aesthetics (C. Barrett, Ed.). Continuum.
Volume 3, Issue 2 - Serial Number 5
January 2025
Pages 107-113

  • Receive Date 04 August 2024
  • Revise Date 08 January 2025
  • Accept Date 20 January 2025