Rahppoye, Hekmat-e Honar

Rahppoye, Hekmat-e Honar

Conceptualization of Highperformance Architecture Theory to Explain Revivalist Trends in Developing Countries

Document Type : Original Article

Author
Professor, Department of Architecture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
The tendency towards "authenticity" has been considered more than ever in developing countries, especially in Islamic countries. Nowadays, revivalist trends have become one of the most important currents in the contemporary art and architecture of Islamic countries. The literature shows that these trends, in addition to their strengths, also had several weaknesses. In Iran, along with the other trends in the developing countries, revivalism acts as a dominant trend in the scene of contemporary architecture. Revivalist trends in Iran, in search of a contemporary expression, decided to establish an outstanding model of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The highperformance architecture theory as a futuristic phenomenon is to outline a future for the architecture of the world especially for the future architecture of the developing countries such as Iran. The context analysis show that Islamic countries of the West of Asia and the North Africa (MENA) region and other Islamic countries. As a leading architectural theory, the highperformance architecture theory is to outline a framework for the interaction of technology and prosperity in order to meet "excellence".
The main goal of research is to find the similarities and differences of the proposed theory with other competing theories in the Islamic countries. The main purpose of this study is to reunderstand the revivalist tendencies in Islamic countries, and to analyze their strengths and weaknesses in comparison with the highperformance architecture theory.
The methodology of the research is based on abduction and logical argumentation research strategy. Regarding the "designerly" character of highperformance architecture theory, the methodology of the research is to include theory and practice simultaneously. Based on the outlined goal, the results of the research can provide a framework for comprehensive policies in the field of art and architecture of Islamic countries. From a methodological point of view, the research examines the revivalist theories and practices in the art and architecture of Islamic countries with the logical argumentation strategy. For the reasoning process, the research has adopted the descriptive-analytical methodology. In analyzing the effects and procedures, it uses semantic content analysis and modeling methods. Research with a forward-looking futuristic approach, seeking to draw what is the desired model of art and architecture, at the level of the 20-year vision document of the Islamic Republic of Iran; as an inspiring model for other Islamic countries.
Research findings show that both anti-technology and anti-traditional trends have been doomed to fail in the field of practice. These reactionary trends led to a kind of "extreme traditionalism" or "imitation architecture" in the contemporary architecture of the developing countries such as Iran. The results show a weakness in understanding the context in order to have a futuristic and a conceptual perspective toward the future. The recent trends suffer from lack of integrity and comprehensive understanding. The results are petro-dollars for a hasty pastiche architectural style in some developing countries which results in environmentally catastrophe and energy-hungry style of development.
The conclusion of the research underscores that an essential shortcoming of the existing theories in the field of art and architecture of Islamic countries is the lack of practicality in the field of "design", and the weakness of comprehensiveness in the field of "technology". It highlights that a successful architecture theory has to criticize the extremist traditionalism and the imitation-eclecticism in order to find a way toward the future. The highperformance architecture theory has to respect the context in order to learn from indigenous identity, and to adopt the new technologies in order to meet the excellence in design. In this perspective, it could be an alternative for the future of art and architecture in Islamic countries as well as the developing countries.
Keywords

Bemanian, M. R., Mahdavinejad, M. J., & Pilehchiha, P. (2017). In search of the future city: Numerical methods and optimization algorithms in enhancing the quality of ecological design [Darjostojuye shahre ayande: Ravesh-haye adadi va algorith-haye beynsazi dar erteghaye keyfiyat-e tarrhi-e boom-sazgar]. Tehran Municipality - Tehran Beautification Organization. (In Persian).
Curtis, W. J. R. (2014). Modern architecture since 1900 [Memari-ye modern az 1900] (M. Goodarzi, Trans.). Samt. (In Persian).
Diba, D. (1995). A review of contemporary world architecture and the issue of identity [Moruri bar memari-ye moaser-e jahan va masale-ye hoviyat]. Honar-ha-ye Ziba, *1*(1), 46-58. (In Persian).
Diba, D., Khademzadeh, M. H., Shayan, H. R., Kamelnia, H., & Mahdavinejad, M. J. (2006). Examining approaches in contemporary Iranian architecture: A physical-content analysis of buildings from the 1980s-2000s [Barrasi-ye ravikard-haye memari-ye moaser-e Iran: Tahlil-e kalbadi-ye mohtavai-ye bana-haye dahe-ye 80-60]. Memari va Shahrsazi, (84), 18-29. (In Persian).
Fahimifar, A. A. (2004). Philosophical theories of Martyr Motahhari about art [Nazariye-haye falsafi-ye Shahid Motahhari darbare-ye honar]. Zibashenakht, (11). (In Persian).
Fahimifar, A. A. (2007). The aesthetic nature of television media [Mahlat-e zibai shenakhti-ye resane-ye televizion]. Ravaq-e Honar va Andishe, (14), 30-45. (In Persian).
Groote, L., & Wang, D. (2019). Research methods in architecture [Ravesh-haye tahghigh dar memari] (A. Einifar, Trans.). University of Tehran. (In Persian).
Jahanbegloo, R. (2001). Iran and modernity [Iran va moderniteh]. Goftar. (In Persian).
Kamelnia, H., & Mahdavinejad, M. J. (2018). Introduction to contemporary architecture from east to west: Examining its foundations, concepts, and formative roots [Ashenai ba memari-ye moaser az sharq ta gharb: Barrasi-ye mabani, mafahim va rishe-haye shekl-giri-ye an]. Elm-e Memar. (In Persian).
Mahdavinejad, M. J. (2011). The trajectory of architectural thought [Seir-e andishe-haye memari]. Jihad Daneshgahi, University of Tehran. (In Persian).
Mahdavinejad, M. J. (2013). The new generation of contemporary architects of the Islamic world – Rasem Badran. Critical correction of James Steele's book [Nasl-e jadid-e memaran-e moaser-e jahan-e Eslam – Rasem Badran. Tashih-e enteghadi-ye ketab-e James Steele]. Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch. (In Persian).
Mahdavinejad, M. J. (2013). The interaction and confrontation of regionalism and globalization in contemporary architecture [Ta'amol va taqabol-e mantaghe-gerai va jahani-shodan dar memari-ye moaser]. Pazhuhesh-ha-ye Memari-ye Eslami, *1*(1), 59-75. (In Persian).
Mahdavinejad, M. J. (2014). Algorithmic architecture; Data logging and advanced quantitative programming methods in the contemporary architectural design process [Memari-ye algorithimi; Dade-negari va ravesh-haye pishrafteh barnameh dahi-ye meghdari dar farayand-e tarrhi-ye memari-ye moaser]. Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch. (In Persian).
Mahdavinejad, M. J. (2014). The challenge of technology and flourishing in contemporary architecture of developing countries [Chalesh-e fanavari va shekofai dar memari-ye moaser-e keshvar-haye dar hale tose'eh]. Nagsh-e Jahan - Motale'at-e Nazari va Fanavari-haye Novin-e Memari va Shahrsazi, *4*(2), 36-46. (In Persian).
Mahdavinejad, M. J. (2018). Leading architecture: The grammar of Iran's future architecture [Memari-ye saramad: Dastur-e zaban-e memari-ye ayande-ye Iran]. Tarbiat Modares University. (In Persian).
Mahdavinejad, M. J. (2018). The outlook of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the field of art [Cheshm-andaz-e Jomhuri-ye Eslami-ye Iran dar houze-ye honar]. Expediency Discernment Council, Foresight and Future Studies Research Center. (In Persian).
Mahdavinejad, M. J., & Demirchilo, L. (2017). The grammar of sustainability for modern Iranian architecture [Dastur-e zaban-e paidari baraye memari-ye novin-e Iran]. Hanoon. (In Persian).
Mahdavinejad, M. J., & Jaafari, F. (2013). The interaction and confrontation of regionalism and globalization in contemporary architecture [Ta'amol va taqabol-e mantaghe-gerai va jahani-shodan dar memari-ye moaser]. Pazhuhesh-ha-ye Memari-ye Eslami, *1*(1), 59-75. (In Persian).
Mahdavinejad, M. J., Khabari, M. A., & Askari Moghaddam, R. (2010). Revivalism and contemporary Iranian architecture in the years after the victory of the Islamic Revolution [Tajdid-e hayat-gera-i va memari-ye moaser-e Iran dar sal-ha-ye pas az piruzi-e Enqelab-e Eslami]. Shahr-e Irani-ye Eslami, *2*(1), 95-102. (In Persian).
Mahdavinejad, M. J., & Saadeatjoo, P. (2014). Identity-seeking in contemporary architecture of Islamic countries; Case study: Saudi Arabia [Hoviyat-gera-i dar memari-ye moaser-e keshvar-haye Eslami; Namoon-e moredi: Arabestan-e Sa'udi]. Pazhuhesh-ha-ye Memari-ye Eslami, *1*(3), 75-92. (In Persian).
Nesbitt, K. (2007). *Theorizing a new agenda for architecture: An anthology of architectural theory 1965-1995* [Nazariye-haye pasamodern dar memari] (M. R. Shirazi, Trans.). Ney. (In Persian).
Pourzargar, M. R. (2000). The crisis of thought formation in contemporary Iranian architecture [Bohran-e shekl-giri-ye andisheh dar memari-ye moaser-e Iran]. Memari va Shahrsazi, (60-61). (In Persian).
Pishvaee, H. R., Mirzaei, Z., & Zarei Hajiabadi, S. (2020). Examining key categories in the literature of contemporary Iranian architecture: 1946-2015 [Barrasi-ye maghulat-e kelidi dar adabiyat-e memari-ye moaser-e Iran: 1325-1394]. Soffeh, *30*(2), 17-44. (In Persian).
Shayan, H. R., Einifar, A., & Diba, D. (2009). Design concepts in a foreign context: Analysis of regionalism in the works of non-native architects in Muslim countries of the Persian Gulf region [Mafahim-e tarrhi dar zamine-ye biganeh: Tahlil-e mantaghe-gerai dar asar-e memaran-e gheir-e boomi dar keshvar-haye Eslami-e houze-ye Khalij-e Fars]. Honar-ha-ye Ziba - Memari va Shahrsazi, (38), 49-60. (In Persian).
Shirazi, A. A., & Younesi, M. (2011). The impact of nationalism on the architecture of government buildings in the first Pahlavi period [Tasir-e melli-gera-i bar memari-ye bana-haye hokoomati-e dore-ye Pahlavi-ye aval]. Motale'at-e Shahr-e Irani-ye Eslami, *4*(1), 59-69. (In Persian).
Tzonis, A. (2003). Introducing an architecture of the present. Critical regionalism and the design of identity. In L. Lefaivre & A. Tzonis, Critical Regionalism: Architecture and Identity in a Globalised World (pp. 10-20). Prestel Publishing.
Wu, X., & Gutschow, K. (2006). Concrete Resistance: Ando in the context of critical regionalism. History of Architectural Theory, 48-311.
Zekrgoo, A. H. (2015). Eclecticism as a style: New approaches in contemporary mosque architecture in Malaysia [Eltiqat be moshabe-ye sabk: Ravikard-haye novin dar memari-ye moaser-e masjed dar Malaysia]. Firouzeh-ye Eslam, *1*(1), 101-108. (In Persian).
Volume 1, Issue 1 - Serial Number 1
December 2022
Pages 27-38

  • Receive Date 15 February 2022
  • Accept Date 10 May 2022