نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله English
نویسنده English
Theopoetics, as a contemporary approach to interpreting religious texts, seeks to recreate and reinterpret sacred scriptures through the lens of productive and artistic imagination. This method enables us to derive new meanings from religious texts and connect them to modern life and its challenges. In this article, drawing on Paul Ricoeur's theory, the role of productive imagination in this tradition and the theopoetic reading of holy texts is explored in greater depth. Ricoeur emphasizes imagination as a transformative force, demonstrating how it can expand and augment reality. The article also analyzes examples of sacred imagery in religious language and art, examining how religious works of art (such as icons) generate meaningful and impactful images through linguistic creativity. These metaphors and images are conveyed to audiences through the imagination of the creator, potentially transforming individuals' religious understanding and experiences. Additionally, the article considers the motivations behind the emergence of theopoetics in the contemporary era and argues that this approach offers a response to the spiritual and cultural needs of modern society. Overall, the article aims to demonstrate that theopoetics, with its emphasis on creativity and imagination, provides a new avenue for rereading and interpreting religious texts, contributing to a deeper and more meaningful religious experience.
کلیدواژهها English
Caputo, J. D., & Keller, C. (2006-2007). Theopoetic/Theopolitic. Cross Currents, 56(4), 105–111.
Eckhart, M. (1983). Meditations with Meister Eckhart (M. Fox, Trans. & Ed.). Bear and Company.
Geniusas, S. (2015). Between phenomenology and hermeneutics: Paul Ricoeur’s philosophy of imagination. Human Studies, 38, 223–241.
Geniusas, S. (2016). Against the Sartrean background: Ricoeur’s lectures on imagination. Research in Phenomenology, 46, 98–116.
Holland, S. (2006). How do stories save us? Eerdmans.
Hopper, S. R. (1967). Interpretation: The poetry of meaning. In D. L. Miller (Ed.), Interpretation: The poetry of meaning (pp. ix-xxi). Harcourt Brace.
Hopper, S. R. (1992). The literary imagination and the doing of theology. In R. M. Keiser & T. Stoneburner (Eds.), The way of transfiguration: Religious imagination as theopoiesis (pp. 207–229). Westminster/John Knox Press.
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. University of Chicago Press.
Kearney, R. (2006). Epiphanies of the everyday: Toward a micro-eschatology. In J. P. Manoussakis (Ed.), After God (pp. 3–20). Fordham University Press.
Kearney, R. (2010). Anatheism: Returning to God after God. Columbia University Press.
Kearney, R. (2001). The God who may be: A hermeneutics of religion. Indiana University Press.
Kearney, R. (2002). On stories. Routledge.
Kearney, R. (1988). The wake of imagination: Toward a postmodern culture. University of Minnesota Press.
Keefe-Perry, C. (2014). A heraldic ethic: Critical resistance, theopoetic embodiment, and dialogical impulses. THEOPOETICS, 1(1), 34–69.
Keller, C. (2003). Face of the deep: A theology of becoming. Routledge.
Miller, D. L. (1987). Introduction: 'Why persimmons?' and other poems: Transformations of theology in poetry. In S. R. Hopper, The way of transfiguration: Religious imagination as theopoiesis (pp. 1-15). Scholars Press.
Ricoeur, P. (1981). Hermeneutics and the human sciences (J. B. Thompson, Ed. & Trans.). Cambridge University Press.
Ricoeur, P. (1974). The conflict of interpretations: Essays in hermeneutics. Northwestern University Press.
Ricoeur, P. (1979). The function of fiction in shaping reality. Man and World, 12, 123–141.
Ricoeur, P. (2024). Lectures on imagination (G. H. Taylor, R. D. Sweeney, J. Amalric, & P. F. Crosby, Eds.). University of Chicago Press.
Ricoeur, P., & Venema, H. I. (2000). Identifying selfhood: Imagination, narrative, and hermeneutics in the thought of Paul Ricœur. State University of New York Press.
Toussard, F., & Luxereau, J. (1397). The Greek divine in the view of Hegel, Walter F. Otto, and Heidegger [Amr-e Elahi-ye Yunani dar Nazar-e Hegel, Walter F. Otto va Heidegger] (S. Ooliaei, Trans.). Tehran: Shavand. (In Persian).
